My attention falls on an odd number detail that is the number from which leaving in order to analyze like they come used the odds in order to trick or to move the opinion of a bettor in favorable direction to the house. The number in issue is 1,88. In the first days of April I find them this relative odd to under 2,50 of the game Lyn v Lillestrom, Norwegian championship, and thinking next to played of last years a little I try to remember itself played winning on that odd
Not of memory, but bet anyway. After 20 ' the result is 0-3, headed lost; the final result will be 1-4. That number however had made me curious and successively I will discover, thanks to the collaboration of an indeed special girl, than psychologically speaking, the 88 and the 8 in general terms, are numbers that gives tranquillity. First thought: to head to us against (that game was ended contrarily to the 88 with beautiful a 1-4) (Over 2,50). We try to discover something more and we will notice that it is not own thus. The 88 servants to the bookmaker to hold balanced the headed ones between the several relative selections to the goal. We see as other games with odd 1,88 end on Under 2,50:
25/05/2008 Sao Paulo v Coritiba 1-1
Draw
Both have scored
Double Chance: 1X e X2
Under 2,50
25/05/2008 Goias v Ipatinga 1-1
Draw
Both have scored
Double Chance: 1X e X2
Under 2,50
26/05/2008 Landskrona v IF Orgryte 1-2
Away
Both have scored
Double Chance: 12 e X2
Over 2,50
02/06/2008 Atvidaberg v Landskrona 1-2
Away
Both have scored
Double Chance: 12 e X2
Over 2,50
Impressive is the fact that 5 left on 5 ends draw or away and with both the squares whom they have marked. Insignificant it is the Under/Over market as it is divided fairly. We observe also that 2 on 5 end in a draw and this is important since however the draw has a enough high odd to guarantee gain also with corrected 50% of. Other interesting fact is that no game is ended with an home win; Also with quotas lowlands like the example of the Sao Paulo @ 1,45 selection that got great credit between the bettor, to see OLBG.co.uk where 100% of the headed ones at that game were on home. The tips arrived approximately to 100 therefore the data was enough meaningful and important. Other fact to consider is that 4 on 5 end in the often used range for other type of nose-dive of 2 or 3 goal. What is asked me then succeeds when the 88 appear in other selections always comprised in the Goal category. We see:
26/05/2008 Austria v Nigeria (.88 on Over 2,50) 1-1
Draw
Both have scored
Double Chance: 1X e X2
Under 2,50
27/05/2008 Georgia v Estonia (.88 on NO Goal) 1-1
Draw
Both have scored
Double Chance: 1X e X2
Under 2,50
28/05/2008 France U21 v Portugal U21 (.88 su Over 2,50) 1-1
Draw
Both have scored
Double Chance: 1X e X2
Under 2,50
Now the data are still more impressive:
In 8 left on 8 the teams have marked both
In 8 left on 8 the home teams has not won
In 7 left on 8 the number of goals is 2 or 3
In 5 left on 8 the result has been of 1-1
In 5 left on 8 it has been a draw
In 5 left on 8 is ended with an Under 2,50
Observing well we discover that the,88 come put in contrast to the .75
Wrong proportion; mistaken of purpose. We make attention the data that gives the other encounter to us: We find the parity between quotas to 2 distinguished levels, and this has had to how much margin of gain the bookmaker wants to have.
As an example snai from the parity to .80 or .85 according to the type of nose-dive. We take the parity to .80: Data of fact | 80 ag 80 | 70 ag 90 | 60 ag EVS |
Given to the proportions the ag of 88 it would have to be 72. Why then the contrapposto it is the 75? It is 75 because 72 and 88 are numbers with perceptive characteristics similar therefore to the bookmaker would not serve to move the headed ones for a sure selection.
Parity to .85:
Data of fact | 85 ag 85 | 80 ag 90 | 75 ag 95 |
In this case 88 it would have to be in contrast to 82. Same motivations of the 72. Therefore any is the used method of attribution coupled value 75 to 88 is deceptive. This door to other considerations, if as mentioned above the proportions brought back probably come respected want to say that for the bookmaker the played one from the user is indifferent which or. That it wants to say that in situations of the sort will have to be the ability of the bettor to strike the bookie.
|
